نمونه های رایتینگ آیلتس نمره 6.5

1) Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another?

Among the most typical inventions of the 20th century is the presence of the Internet, which was made possible by modern science and technology. It is undeniable that the Internet has facilitated communication and connectivity between people, contributing to the overall reduction of distances between people. I completely agree with the statement above that the Internet brings us closer rather than ever before.

On the one hand, using the Internet for communication is an inexpensive and time-saving option. Vietnamese phone calls or communications can cost hundreds to thousands of VND, however, sending messages via the Internet is highly affordable. When there was no Internet, it was critical to keep in touch with relatives through letters. Dropping them a line and getting a response could take weeks or months. Internet-connected gadgets, in contrast, make it possible for individuals to send and receive instant messages immediately.

On the other hand, the Internet removes distance barriers between people living in remote areas. Through the use of email, messenger and Instagram, people are able to stay in contact with friends, colleagues, and relatives. As an example, consider the Covid-19 epidemic. Online applications are used by a multitude of companies and schools around the world to organize classes and meetings. By chatting on social networks, we are also more likely to find our soulmates on the Internet or make new international friends.

In conclusion, Internet enhancements make human lives more convenient and comfortable. As a result, communication environments become more accessible and the vast world gradually becomes a highly interconnected global village.

2) Some people hold the view that a good teacher is more important for education success while others think the student’s attitude is more important to succeed in education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In this modern time, whether superior instructors are more important or learners attitudes for better academic growth have become a much debatable notion among some people.   Therefore, different people support various points. However, in the essay I will explain both views briefly.

To begin with, those who reckon teachers are more important for the improvement of education give their reason as follows. Since assistants is the backbone of our society without their contribution a nation will never be able to grow rapidly. Moreover, pupils learn maximum things in schools such as respecting elders , morality and many other kinds of stuff. Furthermore, if a person wants to become successful in their life they have to learn life lessons but without the help of ,faculty member it is impossible. In addition, they can also bring sunshine to pupils life. For example, research shows that when a student suffers from depression or other mental problems a good teacher can easily mitigate this issue because they have the quality .What is more, they can also assist weak students with their teaching skills .Hence , it can be said that educational prosperity highly depends on teachers.

On the other side ,there are also some masses who claim that pupils attitude is more significant than anything. Although teachers teach everything to them ,yet it remains up to them whether they wanted to learn or not .If they don’t have any interest in their subjects they will never be able to understand it .For instance, research from the University of Manitoba indicates that about 17% of students failed in their exams because they never sited for studying. So , that’s the main reason why a vast number of individuals reckon students behaviour as an important aspect.

In conclusion, I would say even though academic growth mostly depends on learners,,,still in many ,cases it is highly recommended to have a great teacher.

3) News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?

News and media are the backbones of a country. They provide us with current affairs, useful knowledge and make us up to date. News editors and reporters manage all the things and chores that what to telecast on television and how much it will be published. It has both privileges and some effects on society and on news. Now, this essay will discuss the factors affecting this decision of makers and some consequences of giving all power to the editors.

To embark on, every person watches or read the news to grab information and want to know about the surroundings. News editors have the special power to rephrase news in a good manner that viewers can easily understand the thing or problem. For example- in India, there was a dispute between India and China  and at that time media manage the broadcasting very well and make thing clear in front of people and influence them to boycott Chinese equipment or other stuff and people did it very well they completely ban Chinese goods.

Apart from this, there are many cases seen that in which news editors were corrupted and they create false news or depress the truth. For instance- now in this scenario, Indian farmers are protesting in the capital and some sold media channels call famers as a terrorist and convey wrong information on their respective channels. So, this creates a problem for the farmers and for common people.

To put in the nutshell, publishing plays a crucial in the development of a nation. So, they should have to be work for the welfare of a society that does not mean that they only have to telecast good announcement. The main thing is that they have to convey true information or news.

4) It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture. We can learn as much as from books, films and the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Today, a few people hold the opinion that travelling may take people too many effects on learning the culture, and it could be completely replaced by reading books, watching films or surfing online. However, in my perspective, travelling could bring more experiences that benefits individual to know the world.

It cannot be denied that travel can facilitate a stranger to approach the local culture with a more realistic sight. During the trip, we could not only broaden our points of view towards specific content, but also enlighten our thoughts by communicating with local people. After experiencing different cultural styles, we could easily make comments on that, which could be memorized deeply in our minds. In addition, learning by travelling could bring us more friends who have common interests with us. Meanwhile, it’s a good opportunity to escape from busy work and focus on things you are interested.

On the contrary, studying at home has so many limitations. Although there are books and films which describe historical attractions and fabulous scenery. Most of them would be too subjective to express opinions from the authors themselves. Thus, you may doubt that if it is the real situation? Nevertheless, in order to avoid being manipulated by others’ words and feedback, it’s better to find out the truth on our own. Besides, using some tools like the internet and social media websites is indeed an effective way to visualize the knowledge, but none of them could leave great impressions on you compared with travelling independently.

In conclusion, even though many tools could be helpful to know the culture, it’s not enough to know the detailed information. In addition , you will be satisfied with tackling the problem on your own through travelling.

5) Some say that the standard of behavior among children has worsened and that this is their parents fault others says that schools are to be blamed. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the current times, we have seen that young kids are at the worst of their behaviour. While a few people are of the opinion that the mother and father are the root cause for this, while some others feel that it is the school institutions that are really at fault. In this essay, we shall look into the role of both the parents and the school.

On one hand we have the parents, who are falling behind in disciplining their child. This is quite evident when they try to satisfy every wish and desires of their children. Further, they also do not impose strict punishment when thier ward steps out of line. For instance, in a recent visit to the mall, we saw a child that was throwing a huge tantrum so that his mom would buy him another toy. The parent failed to bring her son under control and make him realize that he already had a brand new toy. At the end, it was the parent that purchased the additional toy. From this it is quite evident that parents that fail to imbue discipline raise kids with bad behaviour.

On the other hand we have our school institutions that are showing some serious lack of interest in the upbringing of the child. For example, teachers nowadays, are of the opinion that their only role is to impart education or knowledge to the children learning in their class. As a result, they tend to forget that the school is the second home for a kid and they fail to ensure that children develop a good character along with a good education.

To conclude, we can see that parents and school teachers share some part in the misbehaviour of children. It is my opinion that, though teachers play a large role in molding a child’s character, it is the parents prime duty to correct the bad behaviour of children and failing to do would make the parents the root cause for a child’s misbehaviour.

6) Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money. How might having a lot of money make people happy? What other things in life can make people happy?

Having a lot of money is believed to be the answer to a happy life. People that have a great sum of financial resources might have access to goods and to a lifestyle that is very much desired. But there are lots of other things that are very important for happiness that money cannot buy. So that is what I would like to discuss in this essay.

Money is crucial in life, especially in a capitalist society, therefor quality of life is directly linked to how much someone holds on the bank account. Having money is important to provide access to health services, food, housing and education. Also, after satisfying all the basic needs, the individual can dream, in other words, the person is able to really live instead of just survive. Money also brings a feeling of safety, so having financial safety makes it possible to take chances and make decisions based on passion and not fear. Finally, having money enables consumers to buy goods as they wish.

On the other hand, there are lots of things that are crucial for a happy life that can not be bought. Having healthy relationships, being loved, having a purpose, having freedom of speech and feeling safe are just some examples.

To conclude, money is the main resource for living a happy life, but it is not the only one. There are other important aspects of life that make us happy. Without money is very difficult to be happy, but the opposite is not true. It is completely reasonable to think that is possible to be rich and unhappy, actually it is a common situation.

7) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

The question of whether high school should allow students to study the courses that students want to study is the one that is open for debate. Some people believe that a scholar from high school should have the right to study the courses they like. However, other people disagree and stand that teenagers cannot totally be sure what they like and what they need to know at their age. In this essay, I will analyze these points and present my view in favor of people who believe that some courses must be required to consider by students.

From the one side, having a chance to choose what one likes to study can bring many benefits. First of all, a student can be better prepared for the career he likes because he can spend more time studying what he is interested in. Second of all, students will learn with more enthusiasm because they will learn what they like.

From the other side, teenagers often can not completely understand what they want to do in the future. So, given a chance to choose, they can choose classes, which are easy to learn and do not take much time to study. As a result of this after graduation, many students can be unprepared to enroll in universities and, make careers. Personally, I think that some courses such as mathematics, literature, writing English must be required for studying with students. This will help them to gain more knowledge and experience, develop the ability to think logically, improve writing skills, etc. So, students will be better prepared for the real world and independence life.

To sum up, I think that high school should have required courses because it is essential for a student to have a good base for future life. Required courses, as a rule, are more complicated, but they give the opportunity for students to extend their range of interests and help them to develop many important characteristics such as self-confidence, persistence, patience, etc.

8) Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods and give your own opinion.

Educating child is obligatory to gain vast knowledge about any field, especially education it is the key to develop our nation. Few people have thought about enlighten child at home is the best to approach to develop them. While, number of people think school is the significant place from them to learn. I strongly concur that children must go to school for getting knowledge. This essay will showcase the benefits and the drawbacks of both in the following paragraph with relevant examples.

On the one hand, people and kids feel free, especially it is the place as individuals called it a comfort zone. Instruct adolescents at home is advantageous in many ways, firstly, it is a cost saving along with kids get more time to involve in extra activity, also, the most significant part is they do not have to wear uniform. For example, if parents start toturing at home then it will save their money such as they would not have to pay for transportation as well as no need to buy school uniform. Furthermore, children get more time to play in spite of they do not have to travel anywhere. However, there are few demerits of it. Moreover, there would be a stumbling block especially when it comes on stage performances or social gatherings.

On the other hand, to embark with the key reasons to support my ideology is that, school is the place where everyone obtains discipline and manner, the value of time, together with, rules and regulations. It is not neglectable that, if the parents start teaching at home have various advantages, nevertheless they not be aware of surrounding or social activities, which they could observe or take a part in at school. For instance, children involved in curriculum activities apart from study. In addition, they would be more socialize, in terms of solving group assignments, sharing thoughts with classmates, giving speech in front of the class and so on, so these all help them to be brave and fearless.

To conclude, considering above mentioned points it is evident that, although home teaching has many benefits with regard to, reduce  expenses and get more time to play. In my opinion, school teaching involves  more benefits and discipline.

9) Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with poor. What are some reasons for poverty? What can we do to help poor?

Misery is an issue every nation has to deal with. This essay will outline why the country history and the current investment in schooling have caused and maintained this problem and why donations and spending sums of money to literate the population can help the poor.

To begin with, the reasons behind poverty start a long time ago with the colonization process. Normally, countries that have been conquered and explored in the past, today are still mostly considered in development due to the depletion of their riches. Historically, nations constructed after a long colony period tends to experience high misery rates. Additionally, the lack of basic education perpetuates poverty in society as it shrinks the possibilities of being hired in well-paid jobs. Despite the myriad of technical positions that do not require basic school subjects knowledge, the inability to read and to write bounds the individual’s perspectives.

Furthermore, some alternatives are needed to help those people. First of all, the government can invest in public and free education to open up jobs opportunities for the least fortunate ones in the long term. Hence, with the proper study tools, these people can specialize in a subject of their interest and stand out in the labour market. Another way to help those individuals is by donating indispensable items. For instance, some families cannot afford food, clothes and pay their household bills with their salary. Thereby, donating basic food baskets, clothes or money can help to mitigate these problems.

To conclude, the history of the country and society’s schooling status are some of the reasons that have caused and perpetuated poverty among the population. Although, investing in education and kindness, practiced by donating, can help these individuals both immediately and in the future.